
jrice
Jan 29, 2004, 7:40 PM
Post #3 of 3
(198 views)
Shortcut
|
I haven't actually looked at the law in quite a while, which is obviously a disadvantage. But when the liberalization of nationality laws was approved, it did not grant citizenship and reserved some privileges (the ability to be a port captain, for example, or to vote) only to citizens (as opposed to "nationals" -- a very fine distinction). I'm pretty sure it did not involve renouncing existing citizenship since it was explicitly aimed at maintaining ties with people who were now U.S. citizens. You could be referring to a different section or maybe the one I am thinking of was something else. I recall it because the distinctions were so finicky and because there was so much confusion about citizenship and nationality.
|