
alex .
Sep 16, 2003, 8:05 AM
Post #20 of 28
(1498 views)
Shortcut
|
Re: [hoping 2] I defer to the esteemed Ms.Rose on this one
|
Can't Post | Private Reply
|
I do so because I learned the hard way, and still find locating a good attorney difficult. She knows the website of established practices, what is it www.Hubble & something or another?? In my limited experience the fees charged were by the complexity of the case , not by the hour. In one case I contracted a lawyer for a fixed fee of $250 and estimated time of completion was 15 days. The fee was paid in advance and , other than a receipt issued, no work was done. So that was a lesson learned: don't go with someone who is obviously lowballing the cost to perform on a complicated case. I looked for another lawyer in the paginas amarrilas (yellow pages) and got quoted $5000 USD for the same job. I elected not to go with that one. I then went on the recommendation of a neighbor to a lawyer with a good reputation, known in the community, held a top position in the local penal system. This time it was $1100 up front and over the course of one year the appropriate paperwork was filed with the court system but the court dates were blown off and the case was shelved. Turned out the lawyer had let some convicted criminals escape in exchange for an "exit fee", he got caught, fired (it was in the local paper, I'm pretty sure I still have the electronic version of the article) and is now practicing in Newport Beach , California. So he was too busy to work my case. Another lesson learned, though I'm not sure exactly what it is. So I got a 3rd lawyer on the recommendation of a man I met at the Consulate General who just successfully completed a nearly identical case. This lawyer was a specialist in this particular discipline. I think that is the key: get a specialist. Same as you would a doctor. #3 charged me $750, half in advance and half on completion. He did what he said he would do and it turned out in our favor. In a completely unrelated case a lawyer charged $1000 USD, half in advance. He then, on his own ,sued the party we were dealing with for a much greater sum than we were asking. The party then settled with the lawyer directly, thinking that he was acting on our behalf. The lawyer then stopped our suit by falsifying our signatures (the clerk of the court actually watched him do it) and didn't tell us. My wife got suspicious after several months, went to the courthouse, found the documents and obtained certified copies of the forgeries. When the lawyer called demanding the $500 balance due (not knowing that we were on to him) we "suggested" that our certified copies were worth precisely that amount, que casualidad. Haven't heard from him since. The lesson this time (if you all are still following the tale this far) is that YOU have to follow behind the lawyer to make sure that he is doing his job. YOU have to go to the Palacio and verify that the documents get filed properly, YOU have to discover when the court dates are and which Judge is presiding, YOU have to track any jurisdiction changes. YOU get the impression that you may as well handle the case yourself, however the System requires that you use the services of an attorney. I could describe how witnesses providing false testimony enter the picture, but that is beyond the scope of this contribution. Alex
(This post was edited by alex . on Sep 16, 2003, 8:48 AM)
|