
PBGollaz
Feb 3, 2004, 3:01 PM
Post #5 of 5
(276 views)
Shortcut
|
Hi! Tom, Just as "beauty is in the I of the beholder," to some extent "utility is in the eye of the holder." As is the case with many of the subjects found on this forum, you may hear different answers from different sources. My view of the situation is that you do not need and would probably gain little or no benefit from having an FM-3 in the situation that you outlined. You are basically a tourist, you are staying in Mexico less than 180 days (the maximum time allowed on an FM-T) during each trip and the FM-T is for you. If the situation should change in the future, though, an FM-3 might be of use. Why? Well, foreigners who retire to Mexico or who want to stay longer than 180 days at a time are not considered tourists and should obtain a Forma Migratoria-3 (FM-3). The FM-3 Rentista status is intended for foreigners who are not part of the local work force but are supported by income from outside Mexico or earned from Mexican-based investments. [There are also other classes of FM-3, but none that apply to the situation you asked about]. Holders of an FM-3 can bring reasonable quantities of household goods and one automobile to Mexico when they arrive and can stay up to one year (longer if renewed). The Rentista must show proof of minimum income and the FM-3 can be renewed annually four times at immigration offices within Mexico. After five years, a new FM-3 can be obtained, although many foreign residents elect to upgrade it to an FM-2 visa at that time. An FM-2 is an immigrant visa. It must also be renewed annually. The advantage is that after five years the holder of an FM-2 is eligible to apply for "Inmigrado" status, which is permanent residency (or, alternatively, to apply to become a naturalized citizen). I hope that helps, Patrick Zapopan, Jalisco, México
|