
robt65
Jan 23, 2011, 10:57 AM
Post #20 of 48
(1780 views)
Shortcut
|
Re: [Vichil] Another Car (Title) Question
|
Can't Post | Private Reply
|
Hi Vichil, In answer to your Y/O as you correctly stated it, does mean "and / or". It gives both you and Bob 100% access as it also gives you and Bob 100% access to buying or selling or any other transaction that takes place. It is my understanding from several (both Mexican and American) attorneys, it means 100% ownership (in this case of a car title) unless you are still paying to a bank for it. One can even have a Y/O with a different percentage (for example 60% / 40% ownership as long as it is so stated in the document at hand. You also said. . . . "In our case since we are married under the community property regime and have a will the second name is redondent but I can see how important it would be if we were not married." this also may not be so. Laws do and can be changed, especially as a result of any given court case precidence or simple change of state law. If for example the laws were to change re: community property in any given state (Mexico or the USA) and you had everything Y/O, no such changes would bear any change on your particular legal documents. I also had in my will and property deeds recorded that my name, my wife's name and or (Y/O) our children’s names were put on the property and house. The reason for this is if any death due to an accident were to happen and both Jimena and I were not around, the children would not have a problem being 100% owners of the house and property. I have also done this for the bank accounts and both Jimena's and my wills. Of course the children will not have access (done by a paragraph in the wills), to sell the property until the youngest reaches 25 years of age. In my feeble mind, this assured both Jimena and I that the children would always have a home of their own. The property both here and in the USA are to be kept in a family trust until the year 3000. Then the kids can do what they wish with it. It is our family's hope they will continue to keep it as a family home perpetually. The town folks maybe angry at some point about this because as I understand it, the government cannot even take any of the land (example) for widening highways etc. Something to do with not being able to change a will (even by the government). Oh well, that's their tough luck and I am sure anyway if they really wanted it, the government here or NOB would figure out a way to get it. robt65
(This post was edited by robt65 on Jan 23, 2011, 11:04 AM)
|