
sam.I.am
Sep 1, 2013, 4:38 PM
Post #21 of 28
(841 views)
Shortcut
|
Re: [YucaLandia] Narcoland: The Mexican Drug Lords and their Godfathers (book)
|
Can't Post |
|
Good point. There are a lot of answers that added facets I never imagined on the "Who are Mexicans". Citali, Richmx2, La Isla, Norteño, geezer56 and mcm added some good stuff. There were a number of personally inappropriate posts that moderators deleted, that leave readers with only a partial picture. Returning to this thread's topic: I have trouble seeing the current direct linkage or a broad existence of "mafiocracy" between the Mex. Federal government and the narco cartels. In a connect-the-dots exercise, the authors connect dots in ways that fit their personal preconceptions to create images that fit their intents. Deciding to not aggressively pursue criminals does not mean the the government is directly causing the crime. Prostitution has been around as long as governments and religions have forbidden it. Since the police do not chase down every prostitute and prosecute every john, does it mean that the government supports and works in concert to promote prostitution? Individual instances of corruption do not in and of themselves prove that the whole system is corrupt. Is Capitalism the problem, as posited in the article? A weak non-independent judiciary seems like a bigger cause. The absence of a well funded, well trained, independent, and fully staffed prosecutorial branch of law enforcement seems like a bigger cause of the problems. Based on the bits of the book and article promoted here, I think that "Two Countries Indivisible" offers much better, clearly broader, and more realistic analyses of the problems and practical solutions. Its hard to solve a problem, and hard to move towards solutions, when we miss major issues and mischaracterize other essential issues. This is similar to trying to understand the course of a thread, and make after-the-fact judgements of people's actions, when key pieces have been deleted - especially when the deletions were/are fully appropriate. steve Sorry guy, besides the first paragraph which was meaningless, your whole post reads like a response in a presidential debate. Lots of words but ending up saying nothing. Unless you are running for office, and maybe you are, how about making a firm point and stop the dancing. Teaching a course at .coursera.org may keep you off the streets if you can pull it off.
|