
waterflyer
Sep 21, 2006, 10:36 AM
Post #1 of 20
(1791 views)
Shortcut
|
Ajijic Realtor Increasing Rental Price at Last Minute
|
Can't Post | Private Reply
|
Hi Folks - My boyfriend and I went down to Ajijic over labor day to search out lodgings for our upcoming October move, encouraged by the good folks of this site. We had appointments with several realtors, one of which was a waste of time, and another which had a plethora of listings, from which we found 2 that met our needs and liking. We went back to the realtor after our 2nd viewing of our 1st choice to ask a few additional questions, and to sign the lease. There was a man and a woman in her office, speaking loudly. Mike & I figured it was another prospective tenant, and ignored it. The woman came out to use her cell phone several times, looked me over, and said nothing. When we finally went in, we were told by the realtor that the woman was the owner of the property we were interested in, and she wanted an additional $200.00 for her place. She said that in this way, we would not have to pay for the electricity, which would cost that much per month anyway because of the pool pump. I tried to recall threads I'd read from this forum, to determine whether I thought this was accurate or not. I couldn't, and we were left in doubt. Anyway, oper dinner that night, Mike and I decided we preferred what was originally our 2nd choice. We no longer had the pool/electricity dillemma, although the 2nd one does have a pool. Or so we thought... When we came back to the states, I emailed the realtor to let her know. She has since emailed me back, saying fine, but the owner of the 2nd house now wants $50.00 per month more than the listed price!! Is this normal?? We really are stuck, because we are not able to return in person to look again until we come down with our 3 dogs! It's not so much the $50.00, really, I suppose, but it seems a very bad way to begin a business relationship on her part. Am I missing something culturally? Do they expect me to bargain? I hope it was not a mistake, but I told Mike to tell her that for that much more, the owner should pay the pool man. And that seems strange, too: should we have to pay the pool man? It seems if an owner has a pool, to maintain property values he or she would want to be certain it was maintained the way thay want it. I mean, suppose they got a tenant who didn't give a hoot and never hired anyone? Has anyone else run into this bait and switch before? Thanks much - Waterflyer
|