
NEOhio
Aug 26, 2004, 11:48 PM
Post #32 of 45
(2200 views)
Shortcut
|
Re: [talosian] Upon the Notion of Dogs and Expatriots in Mexico
|
|
|
Spock, a good part of the world doesn't feel the way you (and I) do about the animals that populate their daily lives. Those animals are disposable to those societies. My daughter has had her dog with her in AFrica (Burkina FAso) and in now in Jakarta Indonesia. She had a heck of a time finding a housekeeper and houseman/driver who would work for her with a dog in the house, and as part of their daily responsibilities. That is unnatural and completely foreign to them. Not only did they consider the dog unclean and an ANIMAL, they considered it wasteful to feed, walk and pay attention to an ANIMAL. Because that is what it is to them an ANIMAL and it is not embodied with human characteristics. Sure there are Indonesians who have pets, but it is definitely not the norm. Her worst fear is that someone coming to her house will let the dog out of the walled and gated yard and the dog will disappear - either attacked and killed by the packs that roam the streets, or picked up by a person and taken home and eaten, because it is a clean dog and not a street dog, therefore it is a potential source of food. She can't wait to get back to DC and take a walk with the dog without people stopping to stare and point at her - it is that unusual. I am guessing that the marketing of cats and dogs by a gringa was taking focus away from the other vendors with an activity which they don't completely understand her devotion to but would gladly ignore if it weren't under their noses, disruptive to their purpose there, which is to make a living, and by varying accounts somewhat yucky.
|