
tomgibbs
Jan 1, 2003, 10:14 PM
Post #20 of 58
(6854 views)
Shortcut
|
Re: [raferguson] Personal Freedom in Mexico
|
|
|
Well anyway, back to the topic - about more or less personal freedom in Mexico. This has been a longtime interest of mine: and, I’ll bet, an attraction for many: from the Texas redneck hooting it up in a border bar to college kids in Cancun. Now the Heritage Foundation is not exactly the Red Cross in the sense of being agenda free. Who gets to pick the category criteria and the measurement system in there evaluation? One of the things I liked about this discussion was that it was a grass roots item discussion, both pro and con. If someone says take a taste of this fresh apple, you are dealing with a reality and you can personally evaluate the apple's effect on you. If someone says take a look at the apple market, you can't see any apples at all, only abstract apple policy. You cannot taste the apple. One could be an expert on the aggregate apple market and never have eaten an apple, it's not required to have taste experience. That is how the Heritage Foundation approaches the freedom issue, with abstract criteria. But personal freedom is a personal experience issue, either you experience it, or you don't. Regardless of the presence or absense of a personal freedom policy one will or will not experience a personal freedom. Actually, I think escape from abstraction is one of the attractions of Mexico, especially data and management abstraction. The American ability to put management abstraction into action so readily doesn’t leave much room for these eccentric individual freedoms outside the range of planned possibly. And sure, there is money in mining these abstractions, but the work doesn’t produce poets. It seems in Mexico that plans don’t often execute efficiently. Maybe in Mexico what one is experiencing is more chaos (a negative tainted word that can be brightened up by substituting serendipity….. as you like it.). A poorer government is less able to vigorously pursue it's interests, the people's interests, or it's bidders' interests. Into that vacuum will likely move whatever has energy. In the case of this discussion some folks are noticing that energy is the energy of la gente grasping small opportunities like opening a tienda in there front room. In his a recent book Crossing Over: A Mexican Family on the Migrant Trail the author Ruben Martinez thinks that the poorer, darker Mexican population are the people on the move. In the historical sense they have the life's energy. I think it is the same energy that the expanding European population of the 17th, 18th, and 19th Centuries had when it migrated to America and then pushed across the continent, formed a country, and became a global power. Now the energy is coming form a different direction: the vanquished of 500 years prior are having the faith in life to have big families and they are energetically following the crumbs of opportunity all the way up to packing plants in northern Wisconsin. Meanwhile, European population is in serious trouble with a fertility rate of as low as 1.2 per couple. They are going to have to do one heck of a lot of high energy thinking to substitute for the missing force of people energy; or accept the results of the vacuum. But likely, they won’t have to compete very heavily for jobs. There won’t be enough of them to push the wheelchairs in 30 years. I think chaos is an energy force stronger than insurance actuary tables. The relationship between chaos and order may be an ongoing tension drama rather than the orderly path of necessary economic development culminating in a euphoric consumer society. Chaos is the romantic force. With order you know what you get. The reason you can predict is because the range of possibilities has been drastically simplified. Chaos is full of danger, as well as some charm; and, it has a lot of dark possibilities. But then, order isn’t free from sin. Neither governments nor economic systems are bestowing these little personal freedoms being discuss here, people with the primal energy of life are simply taking them; and thus forming a culture. For instance, Mexican immigrants living here in the north live in a world of risks: it's illegal to be illegal, it illegal to drive without a license, it illegal to drive without insurance, it illegal to work without a permit, it illegal to .....etc. Their crumbs don't come easy, or cheap. They live in a world of these little taken personal freedoms because, for one, they can’t play by the rules if they wanted too. Did I, even for a minute, think that the lady from Guerrero selling elotes con chili y queso on the street in Spanish Harlem had a permit? She improved my experience in Manhattan a great deal that day (and the corn was only 20% higher than what I paid in Zacatecas… and no sales tax). I hope the sun still shines on her. Yup, the mayo could have been bad…..but it wasn’t. Actually, my wife and I both got food poisoning 3 weeks ago at McDonald’s in Decorah, IA (probably the mayo). And nobody ever accused McDonald’s of a lack of intention to organize and apply order. Now I could pursue McDonald’s in an orderly fashion by hiring a lawyer to orderly push an army of corporate defense lawyers through a series courtrooms over a period of some years; or I could abandon the pursuit of order and eat another illegal elote on the streets of NYC. What I experience in the chaos of personal freedoms in Mexico is what I think is the right soil conditions for creativity. For instance, I like the heightened sense of materiality in the rustico esthetic, where chaos is barely managed and lurking just beneath the surface. There is also more personal risk – should I eat at this stand or not, or if I stumble on the street…. I should have been looking where I was going. Now the last persons to appreciate the value of this type of personal risk would be those economic and political theorists busy crowing about value to society of risk taking and the Darwinian importance of rewarding the risk-taker entrepreneur. All in all, it is a more existential way of life, a little closer to the edge. Music or actuary tables?
|