Mexico Connect
Forums  > Specific Focus > Technical Mexico


johanson / Moderator


Jun 12, 2012, 3:24 PM

Post #1 of 8 (3507 views)

Shortcut

DirecTV in Mexico

Can't Post | Private Reply
As some of you may know I have a small condo in Seattle where I escape to several months of the year. I have Comcast for both TV and internet there that I have to pay for at least 9 months of the year whether I'm there or not. And I hate paying for TV when I can’t watch it.

Guess what! The condo is going to give its occupants a choice. They are placing Satellite antennas on the roof and wiring the building for DirecTV as well. Since DirecTV has changed satellites, it’s available in many parts of Mexico to include the Lake Chapala (and Greater Guadalajara Area). With a single 2.4 meter (almost 8 Ft.) in diameter satellite dish to include 3 LNBs (electronics in front of dish) you can pick up programming from three satellites.

Unlike DISH TV where you need a different satellite dish for each of the three satellites (yes 3 satellite dishes), with DirecTV the three satellites are so close together that you only need one satellite dish to receive signals from all three.

If I change to DirecTV up north, I will be able to bring down one of my free receivers to Mexico and hook it up to that 2.4 meter dish and be able to watch many of the programs I subscribe to in Seattle not to include my local network stations.

What no local stations? Nope, both DISH and DirecTV spot beam local stations in the US. (You need to be within about 300 miles from the center of the spot beam to receive it.) Only the wide beams that cover all of the US, bleed over the border and are viewable in most of Mexico.

Yes, this means that the national feeds (stations) on DirecTV are viewable in much of Mexico. It also means that unless you are from say N.Y. or L.A. you will not be able to get your old home town or local network stations. Being from Seattle, I won’t get any of my local channels via DirecTV (nor DISH).

Luckily for those of us from Seattle, Spokane, or Detroit, there is a Canadian system, (Shaw Direct) that includes these cities. I already legally subscribe to Shaw direct (our large family share a primitive summer cottage on Vancouver Island & I pay the Sat TV bill.). With Shaw I get my home town (Seattle & Vancouver) stations in HD.

If I already have Shaw, why do I want DirecTV? Because Shaw is strong on Canadian programming but a little weak on US programming (I know I place too high of a value on TV). But between the two systems I will have more than enough to choose from.




YucaLandia


Jun 13, 2012, 6:17 AM

Post #2 of 8 (3482 views)

Shortcut

Re: [johanson] DirecTV in Mexico

Can't Post | Private Reply
What DirecTV satellites do you get there? What change did DirecTV make in satellites?

We get DirecTV here, but it used to take a large dish (1.8 m high quality or 2.4 m lower quality dish) to get mediocre signals on a single satellite. Like you said, no ABC, no NBC, no CBS, no Fox, unless you come from one of a few markets with a CONUS beam of local broadcasts. Since you also have Shaw (which includes CBS, ABC, & NBC), then you are not missing much with your new combination of 2 companies.
steve
-
Read-on MacDuff
E-visit at http://yucalandia.com


johanson / Moderator


Jun 13, 2012, 10:46 AM

Post #3 of 8 (3457 views)

Shortcut

Re: [YucaLandia] DirecTV in Mexico

Can't Post | Private Reply
It’s great news, YucaLandia. You know with DISH TV there is a satellite located at 110 degrees W, one at 119 and the third at 129 W. So depending upon your needs and whether the signal strength was strong enough in your location you would use a separate dish to point at each different satellite. Maybe 5 years ago I also had a DISH system and in those days it was recommended that I use a 4 foot on one, a 6 footer on another and on 129 W. I used my 8 footer. And yes even with satellite dishes this size the signals were marginal and often you would loose channels if it even thought about raining. As DISH upgraded their satellites, and shrank their bleed over into Mexico, I finally simply gave up my DISH subscription, brought the (not my) receiver back to the US and sent it back to the owners, DISH. Imagine now a standard Ku satellite positioned at 101 degrees West, that might have been the one you were pointed at. DirecTV now two has higher frequency, I think Ka band satellites located 1.8 degrees East and West of the Ku band broadcasting at about 20 megs as I recollect. Well the three are so close together that you are able to use one satellite dish with three closely positioned LNBs at the front of the dish. Here is a story I wrote on the subject in the Guadalajara Reporter last year.
Tech Talk by Pete Johanson Sat TV Breakthrough?
techtalk@laguna.com.mx
Do you remember in the early 1990s when we had to have 12 to 18 foot in diameter satellite dishes to pick up our “North of the Border” (NOB) English language TV programming and how now the Shaw Direct satellite dish, for example is only about 2 feet across when watching in Canada? And how the Dish and DirecTV satellite dishes are about the same size if you are watching the programming in the USA? That’s because the frequencies used increased from approximately 4 to 12 GHz. And with the frequencies three times has high (In oversimplified terms) the receiving satellite dishes need to be about 1/3rd as large. Sirius and XM radio use even higher frequencies and that’s one of the primary reasons their satellite antennas/dishes are even smaller.
But along with putting up satellites that broadcast at higher frequencies, therefore requiring smaller satellite antennas to receive the signal, the designers are getting better at focusing their signals on the intended country with less bleed-over into adjoining countries like Mexico.
So to counteract the very weak signals that bleed over into Mexico we need bigger satellite dishes. In fact we need such large satellite dishes to pick up the HD signals from DISH USA that many have given up on DISH altogether in central Mexico. Why? Because even with the largest Ku band satellite dish readily available, 2.4 meters (8 feet) in diameter one could not get reliable signals from the satellites carrying the HD programming
Guess what www.cp-electronics.com out of Guadalajara discovered? DirecTV USA has bounced up the transmission frequencies on some of its newer satellites to about 20 Gigahertz therefore requiring an even smaller receiving satellite antenna in the US. And here in central Mexico, one receives a reasonable signal on the 2.4 meter (8 foot) Ku band satellite dish, which is as explained above, not the case with some of the US DISH Network satellites carrying HD.
It gets better; while with DISH USA, if you want the standard and HD programming, one often has to have three satellite dishes each pointing at a different satellite, the three DirecTV geosynchronous satellites are so close together (the higher frequency satellites are positioned 1.8 degrees east and west of the center Ku band satellite) that you can pick up the signals from all three satellites at once from a single 2.4 meter satellite dish.
Warning: Just like DISH USA, DirecTV sends network programming for most cities on spot beams focused so tightly on those cities, that they’re not viewable more than a few hundred miles away from that city. It would appear that the only the cities of SF and/or NY are available in our area. Check with your satellite dealer to make sure.
My favorite satellite TV delivery system is still Star Choice (aka Shaw Direct) because I can get the network feeds for my home towns of Seattle and Vancouver plus most everything else I like to watch and on a small 2 by 3 foot elliptical dish.


johanson / Moderator


Jun 13, 2012, 10:52 AM

Post #4 of 8 (3457 views)

Shortcut

Re: [johanson] DirecTV in Mexico

Can't Post | Private Reply
For further information about satellite locations, you might want to link to this location (left-click on the word location)


YucaLandia


Jun 14, 2012, 7:02 PM

Post #5 of 8 (3417 views)

Shortcut

Re: [johanson] DirecTV in Mexico

Can't Post | Private Reply
You are one fine guy. We're happy with the the DN programming on 110W and 119W. 61.5W is our other choice here, if you want even more HD programming. Fortunately, you can get almost every CONUS beam 110W transponder here with a carefully adjusted 1.1m dish - and a good quality 1.8m dish pulls in almost all 119W beam CONUS transponders - with no significant rain fade for even moderately thick clouds. It takes really really careful elevation and azimuth adjustments for 119W and slight twisting of the 110W dish to get this performance. Gotta know which transponders are weak, and peak and balance those, while sacrificing a little signal strength on the strong transponders.
-
Read-on MacDuff
E-visit at http://yucalandia.com


johanson / Moderator


Jun 14, 2012, 10:43 PM

Post #6 of 8 (3402 views)

Shortcut

Re: [YucaLandia] DirecTV in Mexico

Can't Post | Private Reply
It sounds like you are much better situated than we are lakeside when it comes to DISH USA.

DISH is just getting too hard for us get here in the Greater Guadalajara Area. Because we now need a larger Ku sat dish than 2.4 meter which we are told is as large as they get. Sure they make them larger, but apparently they are prohibitively expensive above 2.4 meters.

A good friend, who loves DISH network and is sticking with it because he is getting it FTA, told me that he is getting a better signal on 61.5 than we were getting from 129 W.

I've only heard that DirecTV does quite well around Lake Chapala as I have posted above. (I have friends who have it and say it's much better than DISH in our area) But I won't have a chance to sign up for it until after it is installed in the Seattle Condo which I guess will be in September. I can hardly wait.



YucaLandia


Jun 15, 2012, 3:21 PM

Post #7 of 8 (3376 views)

Shortcut

Re: [johanson] DirecTV in Mexico

Can't Post | Private Reply
The larger DN signal strengths and smaller minimum dish sizes here in Yucatan makes geographical sense when you look at the DN coverage maps. Dish Network needs to broadcast strong CONUS beam signals (to eliminate rain fade) to their Florida and Puerto Rico customers. By beaming strong CONUS signals to wrap around South Florida, The Keys, and over to Puerto Rico, they inadvertently have reasonable signal bleed over here to Yucatan. (This is why we chose to stay with DN, even when they replaced 119W and adjusted their coverages, because it sure looks nearly impossible to serve South Florida and Puerto Rico, without broadcasting signals over to Yucatan. They could go to spot beams, and eliminate CONUS beam coverage, but that would tie up a lot of expensive bandwidth/frequencies to serve a few small areas.)
-
Read-on MacDuff
E-visit at http://yucalandia.com


Axience123

Nov 20, 2012, 3:11 AM

Post #8 of 8 (1907 views)

Shortcut

Paid Survey for Messengers

Can't Post | Private Reply
Are you using a messenger such as Skype, Whatsapp, ooVoo etc.? Participate in a survey and win iPad (mini)! This is not spam – you can contact us directly: Gleb Zhukov at gleb.zhukov@axience.com. Please follow the link to sign-up for the survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/5KC7T33
 
 
Search for (advanced search) Powered by Gossamer Forum v.1.2.4