
richmx2

Oct 4, 2011, 1:40 PM
Post #22 of 43
(866 views)
Shortcut
|
Re: [CanuckBob] My Take On How To End The Drug War
|
Can't Post | Private Reply
|
While "PotMex" is tongue in cheek, but the same holds true for cocaine or meth.... PERHAPS the "problem" for the consumer countries' governments being "first worlders" do not control manufacturing or the means of production. As it is, meth depends on raw materials from China and Mongolia, and the finishing work is for the U.S: market, not the domestic Mexican one. Cocaine is transported through Mexico, but it is a South American product. Opium (and its derivatives) certainly were "respectable" drugs back when it was mostly produced in British India, and not denying that there are dangers with unregulated opium use. When the opium trade was subject to international regulation, its interesting that Australia was allowed to continue producing opium and even expand production (it's a major crop in Tasmania) whereas Sinaloa was not. Bolivia, as far as I can tell, is the only country where narcotic sales were an important export, but whose export production has declined sharply, mostly though the simple expedient of paying subsidies to farmers not to grow, finding alternative uses for the stockpiles, and tossing the DEA and other foreign narcotics interdiction agencies out of the country. Of course, the U.S. government keeps seeking to "punish" Bolivia as a result, but they seem to be doing quite well without the "help". Not to say that people here (or in China or Mongolia or Bolivia) don't have their own forms of "mood-altering substances", only that the wealthy counties, dependent on those substances from places like Mexico and Bolivia, seem to only have a problem when they lose control of the production. And, a problem when the "organic" substance competes with those produced by pharmaceutical firms (think of pylocibin or the push to regulate Salvia). Or http://mexfiles.net http://voiceofmexico.com http://editorialmazatlan.com
|