Mexico Connect
Forums  > General > General Forum
First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All


tonyburton


Jul 18, 2011, 5:09 PM

Post #1 of 52 (2757 views)

Shortcut

    

Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
Coincidentally, three posts/articles today look at the question of safety in Mexico or along the US-Mexico border:

Drug Violence:Is it safe to travel in Mexico? (Dr. Richard Rhoda, Geo-Mexico)

Safety in Mexico - US State Dept. and MSNBC Statistics, 2008-2010 (Mexico Mike)

Comparing Crime Rates near the Border with State Crime Rates (USA Today)

Each is a data-driven analysis, based on more than simple hearsay. Even if the quality of the original data does leave some things to be desired, it's the best available at the moment.



Bennie García

Jul 18, 2011, 5:30 PM

Post #2 of 52 (2727 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [tonyburton] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
The authors of the first two links play very loosely with their statistical analysis'. Talk of the old cliche of "apples to oranges". Lightning strikes and car accidents? Get real.

I am not saying that it is either more dangerous or safer but the comparisons they use do not present the problem in an open and honest manner. They do no one a service by doing it thusly IMO.


Reefhound


Jul 18, 2011, 5:46 PM

Post #3 of 52 (2716 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [tonyburton] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
The first link fails to take into account the time exposure. Most Americans are in the USA 52 weeks a year while most Americans take vacations of a week or less. Furthermore, most vacationers hang around at the resort or nearby. Millions of those tourists fly into Cancun/Cozumel/Cabo/etc and stay at all inclusive resorts with their only exposure being the shuttle ride to and from the airport.


dongringo_catemaco


Jul 19, 2011, 7:56 AM

Post #4 of 52 (2636 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [tonyburton] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
Neither study is worth mentioning.
A tourist will remain more likely to be killed by lightning than violence in Mexico, but as long the outrageous daily death tolls of narcos make the headlines, the perception of Mexico as a safe place to visit, will remain damaged.

Mexico is and has been a violent country and after a few years of a downward spiral in murder numbers is now again surpassing the figures of the 1990's and before. But considering demographic growth, Mexico is now more safer than during any of those years.
http://www.icesi.org.mx/documentos/estadisticas/estadisticasOfi/denuncias_homicidio_1997_2010.pdf
Visit Catemaco News



(This post was edited by dongringo_catemaco on Jul 19, 2011, 7:56 AM)


donemry

Jul 19, 2011, 8:21 AM

Post #5 of 52 (2615 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [Bennie García] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply

In Reply To
The authors of the first two links play very loosely with their statistical analysis'. Talk of the old cliche of "apples to oranges". Lightning strikes and car accidents? Get real.

I am not saying that it is either more dangerous or safer but the comparisons they use do not present the problem in an open and honest manner. They do no one a service
by doing it thusly IMO.


And just what is the "open and honest manner" you desire? Is it something other than agreeing with your own opinions? How would you compare the relative safety of living/visiting Mexico vs. the USA?


Bennie García

Jul 19, 2011, 10:50 AM

Post #6 of 52 (2580 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [donemry] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply

In Reply To

And just what is the "open and honest manner" you desire? Is it something other than agreeing with your own opinions? How would you compare the relative safety of living/visiting Mexico vs. the USA?


I didn't offer an opinion so they don't need to meet its criteria. But the methodology of their comparisons suck big time. Their "quantitative" study would be laughed out of class in even the local community college.

More gringos in the USA are killed by lightning each year than are murdered in Mexico. Like I said, get real.


Vichil

Jul 20, 2011, 6:48 AM

Post #7 of 52 (2465 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [Bennie García] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
We just got back from the States, on the plane the stewards asked us about hotels in Ajijic as the airlines is forbidding the crew from staying in Guadalajara for fear of violence!!! What a joke, obviously the lawyers are running the country up there, the land of the free and the brave is no longer free nor brave in my opinion.
We are so happy to be back here.


(This post was edited by Vichil on Jul 20, 2011, 9:15 AM)


Reefhound


Jul 20, 2011, 7:51 AM

Post #8 of 52 (2445 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [Vichil] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
Now that's pretty silly. If they are worried about being in Mexico, seems their risk exposure would be far greater from driving an extra hour each way than just staying in a hotel close to the airport.


arbon

Jul 20, 2011, 8:33 AM

Post #9 of 52 (2429 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [Vichil] Safety - everything is relative?

  |

In Reply To
We just got back from the States, on the plane the stewards asked us about hotels in Ajijic as the airlines is forbidding the crew from staying in Guadaljara for fear of violence!!! What a joke, obviously the lawyers are running the country up there, the land of the free and the brave is no longer free nor brave in my opinion.
We are so happy to be back here.


That would prob' have more to do with insurance, the same way you would have needed to get travel and health insurance to visit the States. No?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



RickS


Jul 20, 2011, 8:34 AM

Post #10 of 52 (2429 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [Reefhound] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
Actually Lake Chapala is just 20 minutes south of the airport, but yes it is silly.... especially since there is a hotel right on the grounds of the airport!


jrpierce


Jul 20, 2011, 9:06 AM

Post #11 of 52 (2421 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [Bennie García] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply


Quote
...the methodology of their comparisons suck big time. Their "quantitative" study would be laughed out of class in even the local community college.


Bennie, I think you are right, however I don't worry too much about that. Casual readers in the US and elsewhere simply won't plow through a sophisticated analysis. They see articles about drug violence in Mexico that often conclude Mexico is dangerous for tourists and thus they are afraid to visit. I'd much rather see articles in the US press that talk about how one is more likely to be killed by lightning than to be hurt on a visit to Mexico.

When I speak with estadoudenses who are afraid of violence here, I just tell them the US State Department reports 111 deaths of US Citizens in Mexico during 2010 out of millions of visits. Everyone seems to agree that is a low number.

So many news articles speak about the total deaths in the drug wars since Calderón became president, which makes it seem like a huge number. To keep it in perspective, I like to point out
a research report out of the University of San Diego (see below) that offers a really careful analysis of some crime statistics in Mexico for the past two years. They assert that the odds of a Mexican being killed in drug violence are about the same as for an American dying in an automobile accident. They also point out that if one is not a narco, a cop, or a small-town mayor, the odds go way down.

http://justiceinmexico.files.wordpress.com/...tbi-drugviolence.pdf

I think we are dealing with a "perception" issue much more than an analytical one.

Jim





Vichil

Jul 20, 2011, 9:14 AM

Post #12 of 52 (2407 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [RickS] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
The crew does not want to stay at the hotel at the airport as there is nothing to do there so they will come into Ajijic since they cannot go into Guadalajara. Pretty silly since they have been staying in Guadalajara in the past and no one got attacked or murdered there.


chinagringo


Jul 20, 2011, 9:43 AM

Post #13 of 52 (2390 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [Vichil] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
Since we are talking US Airways, my guess is that it has nothing much to do with crew safety and more about reducing their costs. American Airlines set the precedent and opened the door for US Airways. While none of the airlines are receiving particularly high grades these days, US Airways seems to consistently be one of the bottom feeders.

It seems that US Airways is hell bent to create public relations nightmares:

http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/...n-usairways-06242011

By the way, sanity prevailed and the prosecutor in CA decided not to formalize the charges against "baggy pants".
Regards,
Neil
Albuquerque, NM



esperanza

Jul 20, 2011, 9:51 AM

Post #14 of 52 (2387 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [jrpierce] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply

In Reply To

Quote
So many news articles speak about the total deaths in the drug wars since Calderón became president, which makes it seem like a huge number.

Paint it with whatever brush you like, but 40,000 deaths is a big number.




http://www.mexicocooks.typepad.com









jrpierce


Jul 20, 2011, 10:15 AM

Post #15 of 52 (2380 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [esperanza] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
Well said--I didn't express myself well on that score. What I wanted to point out is that by always citing the four+ plus year total, news articles can make it seem more horrible than it is. Of course it is far too big a number, but best kept in perspective.

Jim



donemry

Jul 20, 2011, 10:29 AM

Post #16 of 52 (2375 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [esperanza] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply

In Reply To

In Reply To

Quote
So many news articles speak about the total deaths in the drug wars since Calderón became president, which makes it seem like a huge number.

Paint it with whatever brush you like, but 40,000 deaths is a big number.


About 70,000 were murdered in the US during the same period.


YucaLandia


Jul 20, 2011, 11:13 AM

Post #17 of 52 (2355 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [donemry] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
The thread's Subject tells it all: Everything is Relative

Roughly 450,000 - 500,000 were killed in the US during that time period by preventable hospital and medical errors.
Better not go to the doctor or the hospital?

Roughly 100,000-120,000 were killed on US roadways during that time period.
Better not use US public roadways?

It all seems to be a matter of perspective:
Take appropriate precautions, wear your seatbelt, drive a car with airbags, drive defensively, use great care in following physician's advice, insist that doctors and nurses wash their hands every time they enter your room, stay out of rough areas, don't drive at night, ____? Other practical advice?
-
Read-on MacDuff
E-visit at http://yucalandia.com


Bennie García

Jul 20, 2011, 12:15 PM

Post #18 of 52 (2339 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [donemry] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply

In Reply To


About 70,000 were murdered in the US during the same period.


The population is 3 times greater in the US.

Did you say something about subjectivity in an earlier post? Or was objectivity that was the problem?


whynotwrite

Jul 20, 2011, 12:36 PM

Post #19 of 52 (2333 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [Bennie García] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
 But THEY don´t have a drug war going on...that 70,000 is just day to day business. School shootings here, mall shootings there, gang bangers shooting every night. Business as usual.


Bennie García

Jul 20, 2011, 1:41 PM

Post #20 of 52 (2310 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [whynotwrite] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
So the 40,000 figure is just for drug war victims? Then what is the rate for other murder victims in Mexico?

I am not saying that it is safer in one country than the other. I'd just like to see objective arguments instead of the normal subjective crap posted around here.

The comparison between victims of lightning strikes in the US and gringo murder victims Mexico is a good example of some serious bullshit being presented as proof.


tonyburton


Jul 20, 2011, 6:58 PM

Post #21 of 52 (2267 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [jrpierce] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
Jim,
You are right that the TBI study is one of the more informative ones around. It does, however, deal only with totals for each state/municipality, not (for example) rates per 100,000 people.
If you are interested in more, see our (Geo-Mexico's) brief commentary at:
An in-depth analysis of drug violence in Mexico from the University of San Diego’s Trans-Border Institute
Tony


jrpierce


Jul 21, 2011, 7:55 AM

Post #22 of 52 (2205 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [tonyburton] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
Thanks, Tony.... I'll check it out.


raferguson


Jul 21, 2011, 10:16 PM

Post #23 of 52 (2114 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [tonyburton] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
I usually look at a different set of numbers than Americans killed in Mexico, as it is hard to know how many Americans are in Mexico, on average.

I compare homicide rates in the USA and Mexico. Mexico is historically double the US rate, it may be worse now.

Homicides are almost always reported, so the issue of crimes never reported to the police is relatively low. Mexicans tend not to report crimes to the police, so that affects most crime statistics.

I figure if the homicide rate is double, then the other crime rates are likely also higher.

Note the recent discussion about razor wire on top of walls. I don't think that I have ever seen razor wire on top of walls in residential areas in the USA, although it may exist in isolated places. But razor wire is common in Mexico.

Of course, a national average is not necessarily indicative of the local situation. I am pretty sure that Guadalajara is safer than Washington DC, but not as safe as a small town in the USA. We know that Ciudad Juarez has extremely high homicide rates, obviously not the same as other parts of Mexico.

I agree that getting killed in Mexico is not a huge risk, but being a victim of other crime is another issue. I have some data that suggests armed robbery rates in Mexico are much higher than in the USA.

Richard


http://www.fergusonsculpture.com


norteño

Jul 21, 2011, 11:20 PM

Post #24 of 52 (2108 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [raferguson] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply

In Reply To
I usually look at a different set of numbers than Americans killed in Mexico, as it is hard to know how many Americans are in Mexico, on average.

I compare homicide rates in the USA and Mexico. Mexico is historically double the US rate, it may be worse now.

Homicides are almost always reported, so the issue of crimes never reported to the police is relatively low. Mexicans tend not to report crimes to the police, so that affects most crime statistics.

I figure if the homicide rate is double, then the other crime rates are likely also higher.

Note the recent discussion about razor wire on top of walls. I don't think that I have ever seen razor wire on top of walls in residential areas in the USA, although it may exist in isolated places. But razor wire is common in Mexico.

Of course, a national average is not necessarily indicative of the local situation. I am pretty sure that Guadalajara is safer than Washington DC, but not as safe as a small town in the USA. We know that Ciudad Juarez has extremely high homicide rates, obviously not the same as other parts of Mexico.

I agree that getting killed in Mexico is not a huge risk, but being a victim of other crime is another issue. I have some data that suggests armed robbery rates in Mexico are much higher than in the USA.

Richard


You can be sure that the FBI violent crime figures are highly accurate for murder if nothing else, but that is certainly not true in the case of Mexico's crime statistics. For example, 260 bodies dug up in and around the city of Durango and only a handful of them identified, or hundreds of people kidnapped off the highways of Tamaulipas and murdered without being recorded.

Recently someone asserted on this forum that the annual murder rate in the Guadalajara metro area was five per 100,000, which would be about the same as for the U. S. as a whole and rather low for a big central city. As someone who keeps an eye on the news I knew this was wrong on its face, and it spurred me to keep a tally of murders in the eight-municipality Guadalajara metro area and the entire state of Jalisco, as reported in on-line newspapers (mainly El Informador).

Beginning June 17, the papers have reported 151 murders in Jalisco, of which 86 were in the metropolitan Guadalajara area. This does not include eight bodies dug up that were presumed to have been murdered before June 17 or five people killed by police or private citizens where justifiable homicide was indicated. The reporting of murders is often a couple of days late.

Each person can decide for himself from his knowledge of murders committed in his community of Jalisco what the likelihood of a murder being reported in one of these papers is, but if this is the full number of murders in the state over this 35-day period you can do the math using Mexican census figures and find that murders were occurring in both the metropolitan area and the entire state at roughly the annual rate of the District of Columbia, which was 21.9 per 100,000 in 2009 (the last year FBI figures are available for).

The period may have been atypical, of course, and I plan to continue this project to find out, but the reports sure looked to me to be about like what I have been reading every day for a long time.


(This post was edited by norteño on Jul 21, 2011, 11:22 PM)


chinagringo


Jul 23, 2011, 1:19 PM

Post #25 of 52 (1991 views)

Shortcut

    

Re: [Vichil] Safety - everything is relative?

  | Private Reply
US Airways has consistently been ranked quite low for customer satisfaction and a history of cost cutting. In the Friday edition of USA TODAY, the US Pilots Association took out a full page advertisement regarding US Airways. Since the airline and the pilots have been arguing for over five years over seniority issues related to the merger with America West, there is definitely an agenda. However, where there is smoke, there may be fire.

This ad alleges that on June 16, 2011, the Captain of a Trans-Atlantic flight experienced problems with both the primary and backup electrical systems while still on the ground and lost all power. She notified control and their solution was to lull up a power cart and after plugging in, they were able to restart the engines. Since nothing was done in the way of maintenance and the Captain was still receiving faulty readings, she shut the plane down and called for a mechanical inspection. US Airways ordered her to restart the plane and take off to which she refused on the basis of safety concerns for the close to 300 passengers on board. US Airways had the airport police take her into custody and escort her off the plane. They called in another crew and they too refused to fly the plane. Finally after a seven hour delay while repairs were made to the electric system, another crew finally agreed to make the flight.

Certainly makes one stop and think about flying this particular airline!

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/...s-allege-safety.html
Regards,
Neil
Albuquerque, NM



(This post was edited by chinagringo on Jul 23, 2011, 1:51 PM)
First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All
 
 
Search for (advanced search) Powered by Gossamer Forum v.1.2.4